ABC ABC News Aletho Alex Jones American Spectator American Thinker Associated Press Australian Climate Madness BBC Biased BBC Big Government Big Hollywood Bloomberg Boston Globe Business and Media Institute Business Green Canada Free Press Cattle Network Channel 4 Christopher Booker Chron Climate Conspiracy Climate Depot Climate Skeptic Climategate CNN co2science Corbett Report CounterThink Daily Caller Daily Courier Daily Nexus Dakota Voice David Icke Deccan Herald Documents EcoGeek Economic Times Enterprise IT Planet EPA Ethanol Producer Magazine Examiner Express Financial Times Forbes Fortune Fox Gerald Warner Global Research Globe and Mail Gov Monitor Guardian GWPF Heartland Institute Henry Makow Herald Sun Heritage Foundation Human Events Humour IBN Live Independent Independent.ie Infowars inhabitat Investors Business Daily Island of Doubt James Delingpole Jewish World Review John Birch Society JoNova Lew Rockwell Lid Lord Monckton Lusaka Times MacLeans MagicJavaTV MailOnline Mens News Daily Michael Crichton Moderate Voice Mongabay MSN NASA National Geographic National Post National Review Natural News Nature New Europe New Scientist New York Post New York Times News Busters Newser NewsReal No Frakking Consensus North Star National NY Daily Orlando Sentinel Pajamas Media Palestine Telegraph Penny For Your Thoughts Petition Project Popular Technology PressTV Prison Planet Private Eye Probe International Public Citizen Rasmussen Reports Raw Story Reason Red Ice Creations Register Rense Reuters Right Pundits Russia Today Scotsman Shanghai Daily Spiked SPPI Sydney Morning Herald Telegraph Thunderbolts Time Times Higher Education Times Live Times of India TimesOnline Toronto Sun Triple Pundit truTV Turkmenistan News UKIP UPI US News USA Today Video Voice of America Vote Vets Václav Klaus WAG tv Wall Street Journal Washington Examiner Washington Post Washington Times Washington's Blog Watts Up With That? We Are Change Westmorland Gazette What Really Happened Wicked Local Wired World Net Daily YOUTUBE CENSORED

Climategate-inspired fraud probe kicks up storm


by John Gill
20th May 2010





A row over academic freedom has broken out in the US over a state attorney general's demands that a university release documents relating to research-grant applications.

Ken Cuccinelli, attorney general of Virginia, issued a "civil investigative demand" to the University of Virginia last month demanding documents relating to grants obtained by climate scientist Michael Mann.

Mr Cuccinelli is investigating possible violations of the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act in relation to five research grants obtained by Professor Mann, who left Virginia in 2005 and is now based at Pennsylvania State University.

In defence of the move, Brian Gottstein, Mr Cuccinelli's spokesman, cited the controversy caused by the distribution of documents that were leaked or stolen from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia last year.

"Climategate indicates that some climate data may have been deliberately manipulated to arrive at pre-set conclusions," he said.

"The use of manipulated data to apply for taxpayer-funded research grants in Virginia is potentially fraud. The only prudent thing to do was to look into it."

In February, Mr Cuccinelli sought judicial review of the US Environmental Protection Agency's finding that greenhouse-gas emissions pose a threat to public welfare.

Rachel Levinson Waldman, senior counsel at the American Association of University Professors, accused Mr Cuccinelli of attacking academic freedom.

"The breadth of the request suggests that it is meant to intimidate faculty members and discourage them from pursuing politically controversial work; it's a shot across the bow," she said.

"(This) injection of politics into the academic arena is ... counter not only to the interests of scholars in climate science, but also to the interests of the state's flagship institution in academic excellence."

Kent Willis, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union for Virginia, warned that if the institution were to "roll over", it "could chill university-based scientific inquiry". The university is considering its options.


Article courtesy of Times Higher Education

>>>> discuss this topic @ Times Higher Education >>>>