ABC ABC News Aletho Alex Jones American Spectator American Thinker Associated Press Australian Climate Madness BBC Biased BBC Big Government Big Hollywood Bloomberg Boston Globe Business and Media Institute Business Green Canada Free Press Cattle Network Channel 4 Christopher Booker Chron Climate Conspiracy Climate Depot Climate Skeptic Climategate CNN co2science Corbett Report CounterThink Daily Caller Daily Courier Daily Nexus Dakota Voice David Icke Deccan Herald Documents EcoGeek Economic Times Enterprise IT Planet EPA Ethanol Producer Magazine Examiner Express Financial Times Forbes Fortune Fox Gerald Warner Global Research Globe and Mail Gov Monitor Guardian GWPF Heartland Institute Henry Makow Herald Sun Heritage Foundation Human Events Humour IBN Live Independent Independent.ie Infowars inhabitat Investors Business Daily Island of Doubt James Delingpole Jewish World Review John Birch Society JoNova Lew Rockwell Lid Lord Monckton Lusaka Times MacLeans MagicJavaTV MailOnline Mens News Daily Michael Crichton Moderate Voice Mongabay MSN NASA National Geographic National Post National Review Natural News Nature New Europe New Scientist New York Post New York Times News Busters Newser NewsReal No Frakking Consensus North Star National NY Daily Orlando Sentinel Pajamas Media Palestine Telegraph Penny For Your Thoughts Petition Project Popular Technology PressTV Prison Planet Private Eye Probe International Public Citizen Rasmussen Reports Raw Story Reason Red Ice Creations Register Rense Reuters Right Pundits Russia Today Scotsman Shanghai Daily Spiked SPPI Sydney Morning Herald Telegraph Thunderbolts Time Times Higher Education Times Live Times of India TimesOnline Toronto Sun Triple Pundit truTV Turkmenistan News UKIP UPI US News USA Today Video Voice of America Vote Vets Václav Klaus WAG tv Wall Street Journal Washington Examiner Washington Post Washington Times Washington's Blog Watts Up With That? We Are Change Westmorland Gazette What Really Happened Wicked Local Wired World Net Daily YOUTUBE CENSORED

National Academy of Sciences completely ignores Climategate


by T. Lau
25th May 2010


National Academy of Sciences
Issues Reports on Climate Change

During the Bush administration, Congress asked the National Academy of Sciences, comprised of the nation's elite scientists, to study the issue of climate change and issue a report. Last week the NAS did exactly that, and issued three sobering reports on climate change. The reports (titled Advancing the Science for Climate Change, Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change and Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change) are notable because they abandon normal scientific language for an urgent tone in calling for action.

The first report concludes that climate change is happening, and it is caused by humans. The report notes that science is never closed and that there is still serious debate about global warming, but the report states that "climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for -- and in many cases is already affecting -- a broad range of human and natural systems. The report recommends that a single government entity be given the authority and resources to coordinate a national effort to improve understanding and responses to climate change.

The second report on limiting the magnitude of future climate change recommends that the U.S. must reduce domestic greenhouse gas emissions which will require actions beyond business as usual. The report suggests either a tax on emissions or cap and trade, or both, but cautions that putting a price on carbon alone will not reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The third report about adapting to the impacts of climate change makes several recommendations to lawmakers, including making plans now for a possible five foot rise in sea levels by the end of the century. These plans may include relocating population areas away from coasts and shore lines.

Overall the NAS says there is an "urgent need" for the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The scientists also conclude that the evidence makes a "compelling" case that climate change is happening now. With all this science weighing in, and climate reports that 2010 is already shaping up to beat 2009 as the warmest year on the planet on record, are there any climate change doubters left out there?


Article courtesy of Enterprise IT Planet

>>>> discuss this topic @ Enterprise IT Planet >>>>